BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//www.ctbarfdn.org//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.30.10//
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
UID:e9eaf949-76ea-47f0-b5c1-d370952d3287
X-WR-CALDESC:The institution of affirmative action methodologies and requir
 ements moved undergraduate and postgraduate schools to consider qualified 
 students of all races\, ethnicities\, and genders in admissions decisions\
 , thereby reducing discriminatory admissions practices. Consequently\, stu
 dent enrollments have more closely reflected representations of qualified 
 students in relevant applicant populations. The Supreme Court’s decisions 
 in the cases Students for Fair Admissions\, Inc. v. Harvard and Students f
 or Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina have ended affirmative 
 action admission practices. How could the removal of affirmative action af
 fect college and law school admissions? What efforts can be made to preser
 ve the rights of all applicants against discriminatory admission selection
  practices? How can we preserve diversity\, equity\, and inclusion in univ
 ersity and law school student bodies?\n\nCost: Free\n\nCT: 2.0 CLE Credits
  (Ethics)
X-WR-RELCALID:2f50d3f6bd2f53dd276af991b7e51169
X-WR-TIMEZONE:America/New_York
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:America/New_York
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZNAME:EST
DTSTART:20221106T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0400
TZOFFSETTO:-0500
RDATE:20231105T020000
RDATE:20241103T020000
END:STANDARD
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZNAME:EDT
DTSTART:20230312T020000
TZOFFSETFROM:-0500
TZOFFSETTO:-0400
RDATE:20240310T020000
RDATE:20250309T020000
END:DAYLIGHT
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:d86654cb-2b7d-4b13-b4a6-490c85a5a9b5
DTSTAMP:20260421T093351Z
DESCRIPTION:The institution of affirmative action methodologies and require
 ments moved undergraduate and postgraduate schools to consider qualified s
 tudents of all races\, ethnicities\, and genders in admissions decisions\,
  thereby reducing discriminatory admissions practices. Consequently\, stud
 ent enrollments have more closely reflected representations of qualified s
 tudents in relevant applicant populations. The Supreme Court’s decisions i
 n the cases Students for Fair Admissions\, Inc. v. Harvard and Students fo
 r Fair Admissions v. University of North Carolina have ended affirmative a
 ction admission practices. How could the removal of affirmative action aff
 ect college and law school admissions? What efforts can be made to preserv
 e the rights of all applicants against discriminatory admission selection 
 practices? How can we preserve diversity\, equity\, and inclusion in unive
 rsity and law school student bodies?\n\nCost: Free\n\nCT: 2.0 CLE Credits 
 (Ethics)
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230927T173000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230927T193000
LOCATION:
SUMMARY:Motley Speaker Series - We See Color: Affirmative Action’s Impact o
 n Education & Its Future
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR